ACCEPTABILITY OF MULTI-SOURCE FEEDBACK ON PRINCIPALS FOR IMPROVED MANAGEMENT OF SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN ANAMBRA STATE.

Ifunanya Nkechi Ohamobi (PhD)

Abstract


This study examined the level of acceptance of multi-source feedback (MSF) on principals for improved management of public secondary schools in Anambra state. The study was guided by three research questions and three null hypotheses. It adopted the descriptive survey research design. The study was carried out in Anambra state. The population comprised 256 principals, 312 vice principals and 5,970 teachers in the 256 public secondary schools in Anambra state. A sample of 138 principals, 137 vice principals and 1656 teachers were selected through stratified random sampling technique. The instrument for data collection was a researcher designed questionnaire titled “Acceptability of MFS on Principals for School Improvement (AMSFPSI). The instrument was validated by three experts in the Faculty of Education. The reliability of the instrument was determined using cronbach alpha method with overall coefficients of 0.93. The researcher was assisted by five research assistants in collecting data. Mean and standard deviation scores were used to answer the research questions while the ANOVA and Scheffe post HOC were used in testing the null hypotheses at the 0.05 level of significance. The finding shows among others that there was a moderate extent of acceptance of Multi-source feedback (MSF) on principals for improved management of secondary schools in Anambra state. Most of the principals, vice principals and teachers adopted that MSF should serve only six out of the ten stated MSF goals for school improvement. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended among other things that the Anambra state government should consider establishing the use of MSF on principals as it is accepted as being relevant to principals for improved management of secondary schools. In instituting MSF in the secondary schools, government and other stakeholders should consider using the goal of MSF for staff development and not principals appraisal for salary increase, promotion or compensation.


Keywords


Acceptability, Multi-Source Feedback, Management, and Principals

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berk, R.A. (2013). Using the 3600 multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism. Medical teacher, 31(12) 1073-1080. DOI: 10.3109/0142 159080 2572775.

Chang, L. (2014). Self-other agreement in 360-degree leadership ratings: a cross-cultural measurement equivalence study. Doctoral Dissertations. Paper 305. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unconn.edu/ dissertations/305.

Corporate Leadership Council (2011). Considerations for implementing 360 degree reviews: secondary research findings. Washington, DC: Corporate Executive Board.

Corderman, D.S (2014). Perceptual agreement between multi-rater feedback sources in the federal bureau of investigation. Unpublished dissertation, faculty of the Virginia polytechnic Institute and State University.

Ehren, M., Perryman, J. & Shackleton, N. (2015). Setting expectation for good education: how Dutch school inspection drive improvement. School effectiveness and school improvement: an International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice 26(2), 296-327. DOI: 10.180/09243453. 2014.936472.

Elliott, S.N, & Clifford, M. (2014). Principal assessment: Leadership behaviours known to influence schools and the learning of all students (Document No. LS-5). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center Website: http://ceedar.education,ufl.edu/tools/literature-syntheses/ further.

Ermongkonchai, P. (2008). An evaluation of multisource feedback (MSF) for managerial development in large –size manufacturing company in Thailand Contemporary Management Research 4(3) 189-218.

Fraenkel, J.R, Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). Boston: McGraw Hill.

Fullan, N. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, teachers college press.

Maher, J. (2009). The use of 3600 feedback compared to traditional evaluative feedback for the professional growth of teachers. Seton Hall University Dissertation and Theses (ETDs). Paper 1700.

Mbonu, O.A. (2015). A framework for effective complexity management in secondary schools’ administration in Anambra State, Nigeria. The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership, 22(2), 15-23.

Modebelu, M. & Onyali, L.C. (2014). Qualitative record management skills for effective service delivery in Nigerian education system. American Journal of Educational research, 2(12) 1250-1256.

Nwangwu, K. & Ometere, T. (2015). The roles of school managers in managing educational changes in Nigerian schools. European Scientific Journal, 9(25), 160-169.

Nworgu, B.G. (2015). Educational research: Basic issues and methodology. Owerri: Wisdom Publication Limited.

Sergeant, J. (2015). Reflecting upon multisource feedback as ‘assessment for learning. Perspective on medical education 4(2), 55-56.

Taole, M.J. (2013). Exploring principals’ role in providing instructional leadership in rurual high schools in South Africa. Studies in tribes Tribal’s, 11(1), 75-82.

OECD (2014). Pisa 2012: What makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ofoegbu, N. & Obiweluozor, N. (2015). New and unexpected demographic challenges to educational leadership in Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research 5(1), 39-44).

Valiant, D. (2015). School leadership, trends in policies and practices, and improvement in the quality of education. Paper commission for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2015, Education for all 2000-2015: Achievement and challenges”. Parish: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

ISSN PRINT: 2705-2494

ISSN ONLINE: 2705-2486

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.